Sorry, could have interpreted it wrong, but still I guess, logging at the current rate would be detrimental to all the efforts to counterbalance that….would be interesting to know what you guys think about it….
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/gunns-tasmania-agree-on-logging/2007/10/19/1192301045759.html
Comments 2
I think it is saying half of the available timber. Not half of the forest. I.e. out of the timber that that has been allocated for logging, half of it will be used by the mill.
Posted 20 Oct 2007 at 12:13 pm ¶hmm….if that is the case, I guess the fate of the forest is pre determined and just the direction of use varies….kind of makes sense…thanks Iain..was reading it over work..cud have missed something…cheers
Posted 20 Oct 2007 at 1:56 pm ¶